Are we done with discovering all those profound mysteries of Science/Universe which are there to be discovered? Is it true that advanced applications of already known concepts of pure science is the only thing left to be explored further by man? If you believe John Horgan, answer to the questions above is a disturbing yes . “The End of Science” was written by John Horgan in 1996 and the crux of that book was that there is nothing profound left to be discovered by humanity in terms of pure sciences and that all progress in the future will just be application of existing key concepts of physical and biological sciences.
Recently, he wrote an article in the Search magazine where he raised these points again and defended his book further by arguing that his critics have been proved wrong till now, more than ten years after the book was published. He backs up his analysis with convincing arguments which are hard to put down. I cannot deny his arguments but I wonder about the time factor. I mean It’s true that in the last half a century or so, we havent discovered as profound concepts as electromagnetism or quantum mechanics or DNA based genetics or atomic theory of matter, but, not achieving any profound breakthroughs in the last 50-75 years should not mean much in humungous span of hundreds of thousands of years since man has existed ( If you consider the age of universe, then these 50-100 years look even more insignificant). Isn’t it?
I sincerely hope that Horgan is proved wrong in the future because I’m not very enthusiastic about our existing knowledge. If that’s the most what we are ever going to know in terms of profound theories of universe, it will be very discouraging news for me; I mean, all this existing knowledge and theories havent really gotten us anywhere yet!
Here is the link for that article: